Wednesday, 21 January 2015

A WRINKLE IN TIME by Madeleine L'Engle






Madeleine L'Engle's A WRINKLE IN TIME sparked a mind-bending, universe-hopping conversation this month that spanned from Shakespeare to Pluto, tesseracts to sweetshops, and got us talking about time travel and whether in the future we might be able to live on Mars (if, say, we found a way to put a bubble round the planet and built a huge long tube to pipe oxygen there so we could breathe. But there was a worry that we might run out of metal back here on earth ...)
It's soon to be a Disney film from the director of Frozen, apparently - which is interesting because the jury was out in the bookgroup about whether it would make a good movie. Time will tell!
9 out of 10 read it all the way through, 6 out of 10 smiley faces.

"It came to me as an interesting content" - Nathan

"It wasn't my favourite" - Victor

"My favourite part was when Meg almost got killed by the black thing" - Gareth

"My favourite part was when Meg was with Aunt Beast" - Ray

"I thought the book was good because it was very much fantasy and it was exciting and you don't know what happens until you read it" - Charlie





Wednesday, 10 September 2014

September 2014: THE LETTER FOR THE KING




We were on a quest this month, guided by a bestselling Dutch classic that has only now been translated and published in English.

Not all of us made it to deliver the letter and be knighted - this was a book that really divided the group into those who loved it and read it at a pace - Victor couldn't wait to find out what the letter said - and some who found it too slow-moving. And then there were those who forgot to take their book on holiday with them!

It didn't stop us having interesting chats about whether we would have answered the call for help. Lois wasn't so sure - if the knock was someone selling something, she'd politely shut the door and go back to her night-long vigil, thank you very much . . .

And we decided on the virtues we would look for if we, the Knights of the Precise Geometric Shape Table, were to appoint a new member to our Table (we couldn't agree if it was a square, a rectangle, or two rectangles put together. The only thing we were sure of was that it wasn't round . . .) We designed them as shields.

and these were the Virtues:
Chivalrous
Kind
Generous
Honest
Courageous
Honest

And Aoeife's acrostic poem:
Kind
Nice
Interesting
Gracious
Helpful
Trustworthy

Lovely! A noble start to a new Book Club year.



Tuesday, 5 August 2014

July 2014: FAKE MUSTACHE by Tom Angleberger






For our last meeting of the year, we wanted a funny read, and Tom Angleberger didn't disappoint. We had a party to celebrate the end of a brilliant year of reading, an excellent opportunity to wear some fake mustaches of our own . . .


 and of course to draw some to our own design, complete with reviews . . .






‘It’s about a boy trying to stop a boy becoming president. I enjoyed it because it was about mustaches!’

‘It’s about a fake mustache and an evil mastermind. It was fun’

‘It was fun. I’d recommend it to a friend if they like looney stuff!’

‘I enjoyed it because it was funny’



We were even able to send video reviews to our author, and had some great messages from him via Twitter.

And it was a brilliant end to the week - and to our year - to get this message from Abrams & Chronicle, Tom's publisher:


 We swapped books to read over the summer - looking forward to what everyone thought, and to seeing you in September to talk about A LETTER FOR THE KING.




June 2014: CHARMED LIFE by Diana Wynne Jones





Before Harry Potter, there was Charmed Life. Some loved this, some didn't manage to finish and found it a little dated and slow. I still stand by it as a wonderful classic and one of my childhood favourites!



Scarlett:

‘I loved it’



Victor:

‘I enjoyed it. Because I just liked it. It’s about magic, wizardry etc. I would recommend it to a friend’



Rachel:

‘I enjoyed it because it was exciting’



Theo:

‘I liked it because of the ending’



Dylan:

‘A witch called Gwendolen is adopted by Chrestomanci and tries to annoy him. Then she goes to a different dimension. I enjoyed it because it’s about magic’




April 2014: MOMO by Michael Ende

A magical book about storytelling and the importance of taking time to do the fun and little things in life. Some struggled to get through - it maybe doesn't have the narrative drive of more contemporary fiction. Some of us were lucky enough to see the mesmerising theatre production  by Filament at Greenwich Theatre.

‘It’s about a girl called Momo and there are also men in grey and they steal time and Momo tries to get time back. I enjoyed it because it’s different from all the other books I’ve read’

‘It’s about a little girl who lives in a ruined amphitheatre and is really good at listening. I sort of enjoyed it but I had to read it really slowly.’

‘I enjoyed it because it was mysterious’


If I had hour lilies that gave me extra time to use however I liked, I would . . .

Go on the biggest water slide there is

Invite all the friends you know and play xbox for as long as you can

Do something different every day

Go to Paris with my two best friends and go shopping and stay in a Chateau with an indoor Jacuzzi and an outdoor pool

Find a neverending path and see where it leads

Ride through the Sahara desert, climb Everest, then go to Australia with my best friend and go swimming in a Jacuzzi

Work hard but don’t forget to play

Go to the Amazon with all of my friends and see all of the animals and hire a care to drive around

Go to Egypt and see all the pyramids and try to find more mummies

Go to Africa and stay in a tree with a giraffe and lions down below and an eternity pool

March 2014: CLOUD BUSTING by Malorie Blackman




It's a novel in verse, but don't let that put you off: short and very readable, with great discussion topics it's about being different, being brave, and being a true friend.


‘I enjoyed it. It told you about how things can easily change. I would recommend this book to a friend if they like short books. And they like poetry’

‘It was about a boy who was a bully and he wrote a poem about a boy he bullied. I enjoyed it because it was written in the way of a poem. It was very good’

‘I enjoyed it because I like that it’s made up of poems’

‘I enjoyed it because it was funny’

'It had a good meaning. I’d recommend it to a friend, because it helps friendship’

‘I enjoyed it because it is very dramatic. It was about a kid called Sam who was forced to play with Davey. Davey has a very good imagination.’

‘I liked it because of the drama’

 We wrote a poem together, one line each, inspired by reading Cloud Busting. Here it is:

50 per cent of life is all right
30 per cent is rubbish
Twenty percent is really great

Isn't life ...

An ice cream with a cherry on top
A cake with a scoop of ice cream
A big tub of Ben and Jerry's with big chocolate chunks
A rubber band ready to be
Pulled back and flung
A bar of chocolate covered in fudge
A never ending dream
Fast paced just like Paris
Life has nothing to do with spinach
Life is like junk food
Like kids resting under the sky cloud busting
I don't know what life is
A bread stick
Whizzing down the hillside feet off pedals
Climbing to the tallest branch of your favourite tree
and looking down at the tiny world below
A jigsaw ready to be solved
A button ready to be sewn
A mystery wherever you go
A goal ready to be scored
A water park with all the scariest rides
A fish ready to be caught
A baby in a silk dress

February 2014: THE TERRIBLE THING THAT HAPPENED TO BARNABY BROCKET


January 2014: SMALL CHANGE FOR STUART








‘It’s about a boy called Stuart who moves to his old family town. He tries to find out his great-uncle’s secret. I enjoyed it because it was intriguing and scary-but-not-scary . . . It’s very easy to get into’

‘We enjoyed it because it had humour. My favourite part was when he got chased by the triplets!’

‘I enjoyed the book because I like adventure books’

November 2013: EMIL AND THE DETECTIVES

We also went on a trip to see the National Theatre production.

October 2013: WONDER

The clear favourite when we voted for our book of the year.

September 2013: a new school year, and a new year for Book Club

Our introductory meeting for the beginning of a new year, and we first agreed our ground rules:

Read - try to finish each book
Listen to Each Other
Keep an Open Mind
No shouting or Messing Around

Then we had a lovely chat about the books we like the most and what we like to read.

We talked about how we choose books - by reading the blurb, or being recommended from school, or reading the first sentence. We confessed that quite often we read late into the night. And in general we prefer the books to the movies - because as Rachel says 'they miss the exciting bits', and Sophia points out 'they're the originals' and Dylan agrees, recommends reading the book first, because it will have more description.

We like a wide range of different things, but there's a definite preference for fantasy, ('because they can write anything they want'), mysteries and adventures. Sofie particularly likes 'sad mysteries' and Dylan likes to be scared. Sophia says her dad says she's read more books than he has!

You can see our recommended reads on our pinterest board

Katherine Rundell, author of ROOFTOPPERS, visited us in July 2013



Katherine was captivating, and we loved the book - no surprise that it has gone on to win some very well-deserved awards. Here's just a little extract from our chat:


Mercedes:      Did you ever think of joining a circus?
KR:                  Yes! I never thought I’d be a writer, so for a time I had the more realistic ambition of joining a circus. I went to clown school. I always wanted to learn trapeze, but there is no trapeze in Zimbabwe.

Alice:               How do you write?
KR:                  I try to write a thousand words a day. I also teach about Shakespeare during the day, so I get up at 4am to write before I go to work.

Scarlett:          It’s amazing to hear about your childhood in Africa. You really liked it there. Do you like it better here or there?
KR:                  I like them both the same. My mother is still in Zimbabwe, so Africa is home. The world is more wild there. People in England are much better dressed. In Zimbabwe they only wear shorts and sandals, which is wonderful. I’d love to go back.

Rafferty:         I can’t decide whether to be a vet or a writer.
KR:                  Read James Herriot and you’ll see that maybe you can be both!

Maia:               If you could live on a rooftop in Paris for a week, what would you take?
KR:                  How many things am I allowed? Matches, definitely. And my brother. He’s a jazz musician, and very calm. He’s such a cool human being.
Kes the monkey (he could have a tiny backpack and help me carry things). A rain hat and an umbrella, because I used to live in Paris so I know that although when you think of Paris you think of sunlight and stars, actually it rains a lot there, just as much as in London.
Oh, and sausages and a saucepan. Comfort food. Treacle tart. What other comfort food? Yes – sticky toffee pudding, and spaghetti Bolognese and malteser cake.

Alice:               Why did you choose a cello?
KR:                  When I was your age I’d never heard a cello. Then, when I was ten, I was taken to hear Bach played by the best cello player in Zimbabwe. He was a most beautiful human being, a black Zimbabwean man. And I vowed then I’d marry a cello player. Only maybe that won’t happen now because my boyfriend doesn’t play the cello!
            It was also a practical decision, because Sophie is found in a cello case, so it had to be big enough to hold her: either a cello or a double bass, and a double bass is less soulful; and a harp is too difficult to carry around …

Mercedes:      How did you choose the names for your characters? They’re so unusual
KR:                  Vivienne is named after my aunt. Matteo I named because I had a distinct picture in my mind of a boy who could fend for himself. It sounded like a tough name.
                        Anastasia and Saffire – my two cousins wanted to be in the book, so that was easy.
                        Sophie I thought was a good name for a stubborn, practical person.
                        Charles is sort of like one of the Fellows I work with at Oxford, who is one of my favourite people in all the world. When I first wrote it, I used his name, but I had to change it so people couldn’t tell who it was!
And I chose his surname because Maxim means a saying, a famous phrase. And I wanted it to be like maximum, because he’s an extravagant human being.

Scarlett:          My favourite bit was when Sophie was learning to walk on the roof.
                        When I’m reading a book, it’s like watching a little film in your head, and I didn’t want it to end.

Mercedes:      My favourite bit was when she got the package and ate all the food. And my most favourite bit was when she heard her mother’s music. That was …

KR:                  I love writing about food! And reading about it. I always remember the food in LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE: when they make toffee out of snow, and DANNY THE CHAMPION OF THE WORLD and jam sandwiches.
My agent always says that books need to answer the two most important questions: What’s for dinner? And Are we there yet?

Friday, 26 April 2013

OTTIE AND THE BEA BOOK CLUB Meet to talk about THE WOLVES OF WILLOUGHBY CHASE 27 April 2013


We had very different opinions about the Book Club read this month.

Scarlett and Alice really enjoyed it. They liked the story, the adventure and the descriptions, which Scarlett said painted a picture with words.

Giacomo liked the adventure parts of the book, but on the whole found it a bit strange.

Rafferty, Maia and Mercedes didn’t really get into it at all: the beginning was slow, and they had other books they were enjoying more.

Books are so personal, aren’t they? That’s what makes talking about them so interesting: you find out a lot about how people think and feel when they tell you about the books they like.

Like FIVE CHILDREN AND IT, THE WOLVES OF WILLOUGHBY CHASE is a classic. We talked about what we think that means, and whether it makes us more or less likely to want to read a book. Alice had a nice description of them as books ‘from back in the day’ and Maia explained that it can be a book that lots of people like – it doesn’t necessarily have to be old.

Rafferty pointed out the difference between books set in the past and books actually written in olden times. He’s really enjoying MURDER ON STAGE at the moment (and some of the rest of us had liked it too) – it’s a mystery set in Victorian times, but written now. Other books like this we’ve read and enjoyed are VIKING BOY, HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON and the Percy Jackson series.

Maia used to read a lot of classics, but is a bit sick of old-style language now and these days is more into writers like Jacqueline Wilson who use the kind of words we use now, and write about more realistic problems. Mercedes agrees that if something’s called a classic it can be off-putting – like classical music is boring. When your dad plays it in the car it sends you to sleep!

So what did we think about this classic in particular?

It all seemed to depend on whether we had read past the beginning, because the story takes a while to get going and when you first meet Bonnie, the heroine, she seems spoilt and annoying. Rafferty liked the wild wolves in the forest, they were awesome, but stopped reading when he got to the nonsense of the maid and the girl.

Read on, though, and you find that Bonnie changes, and Scarlett enjoyed the surprise. You never expect that she would dress up as a boy, and there are really funny bits – like when Bonnie throws water on Miss Slighcarp and it knocks her wig off. That was one of Scarlett’s favourite bits.

In the back of the book there is a quiz to see which of the main characters you are like: Bonnie, Sylvia, or Simon? (I’m glad to say that Miss Slighcarp isn’t on the list!!) It turned out that a lot of us were like Bonnie, and the others are like Simon – so you see, we’re not that different after all, even if we like to read different things!

Our two reviews this month are from Scarlett and Alice.

Scarlett thought:

“Usually I find classics boring but I really liked this. The story was interesting, and the descriptions really painted a picture with words.”

And this is what Alice said:

“I liked it because it was adventurous and a bit scary – I like scary books”

Looking forward to our next meeting, on 5 June, when we voted to talk about THE APOTHECARY by Maile Meloy. Remember Bea’s suggestion that we all bring a note of our favourite page to share with the group!

Monday, 8 April 2013

OTTIE AND THE BEA BOOK CLUB meet to talk about FIVE CHILDREN AND IT 20 March 2013


If you found a fairy who could grant you any wish you wanted, what would you wish for?

Now that we’ve read FIVE CHILDREN AND IT by E. Nesbit, we know that this isn’t necessarily as brilliant as it first sounds.

We loved the suspense and the adventure in this story, which kept us turning the pages as if it was written yesterday, and not 100 years ago.

It was only the clothes that really give it away as being a classic: Maia was very intrigued to know what pantaloons were. (Very long baggy pants that girls used to wear under their very long dresses, since you’re asking!)

There is a lot in this book that is not as we might have expected, before we started to read. For example, when we hear the word ‘sand fairy’ we all have quite particular pictures in our minds: maybe a Disney style fairy, with a sandy dress, or a boy with an elf hat made out of sand, and sandpaper wings. Definitely not the strange bug-eyed creature described in the book, and so brilliantly illustrated on the cover by Quentin Blake. The Sammyad (for that is his name) looks more like a rat than a fairy, we thought.

So the children in the story are quite brave, really. Even though Mercedes’ favourite animal is a rat, she wasn’t sure she’d make friends with one straight away, if she found one in the sand.

The other thing that turns out not quite as we expected are the wishes. We learned that you must be careful what you wish for, because the Sammyad is very literal in the way that he grants them.

We talked a lot about what we would wish for, if we had the chance.
Maia thought wings.
Rafferty would like things to be perfect (but then, thinking more carefully, knew that the Sammyad would give you what you thought was perfect, which might not be perfect for other people …)
Mercedes would like to change people’s minds about destroying the rainforests.
Giacomo would stop wars and guns.
Grace would feed the children in Africa.
Maia wishes she could meet Jessie J, and she and her best friend could go on tour with her.
Bea would wish to raise all the funds for her trip to Africa – oh, and for world peace, too!

Then we had a really interesting discussion about what the Sammyad might make of our wishes. For example, what if the way he granted Grace’s wish, to feed the children in Africa, was by taking all our food to feed them? Food for thought, indeed …

So here is a book, written a hundred years ago, and starring children who wear pantaloons and don’t have telephones, which got us thinking about the world and talking in a most interesting way.

And we realized that not a lot has changed, really, if you don’t count the clothes and the technology: especially when it comes to country life versus the city. We all agreed that our friends and relatives who live in the countryside are much more free to run around and have adventures.

But, you know, they don’t live near Ottie and The Bea …


See you all after the holidays, when we’ll be talking about THE WOLVES OF WILLOUGHBY CHASE. It’s another classic: will you love it as much as I did, when I was your age?

© Copyright Nigel Cox and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence


Photograph: Kelly Redinger / Design Pics Inc/Rex Features


PS Here is a picture of the gravel pit near where I grew up. As you can see, it's been turned into a nature reserve now ... on the right is a working gravel pit: you can see why parents might not want you to play there!

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

OTTIE AND THE BEA BOOK CLUB Meet to talk about FANTASTIC MR DAHL 27 February 2013

-->
This month, we learned a lot we didn’t know, about Roald Dahl.

We all agreed that he is indeed Fantastic. We hadn’t known that he was irritable – or so tall – or that he inherited so much money from his dad …
FANTASTIC MR DAHL is a non-fiction book, a biography of one of our favourite children’s authors written by Michael Rosen, who is also a very famous writer for children.

Not all of us had read a biography before, and on the whole we think that we prefer to read autobiographies (and in fact Maya has read BOY, which is Roald Dahl’s own autobiography). We worried about whether we could trust what Michael Rosen said, since he wasn’t there to know exactly what happened – and we weren’t sure that he needed to keep asking what we thought about things.

Grace particularly liked the pull-out pages which have lots of fascinating facts: one of our favourites was the fact that there are giant footprints leading to Roald Dahl’s grave!

We learned that a lot of sad things happened in Roald Dahl’s life, like his house being bombed and losing all his photographs and letters (Scarlett said she knew how that might feel – she couldn’t bear to lose her camera), and lots of exciting things too, like being a spy in the war (that was Grace’s favourite bit).

One thing we didn’t learn was when he learned to drive: because we were all very impressed to discover that he bought himself a motorbike when he was just sixteen, and used to ride it around from his boarding school. Bea explained that back when Roald Dahl was a teenager, you didn’t have to have a driving license in the same way. Perhaps he even taught himself how to ride the motorbike. You wouldn’t be allowed to do that now!

Scarlett really enjoyed this book – particularly finding out the alternate endings from when Roald Dahl first wrote his stories (we learned that Matilda was a baddy, which seems hard to believe now we know her so well).

It was interesting that Roald Dahl tried out so many things before he became an author. We thought it seemed that he was good at a lot of things, but was most comfortable with story writing. Giacomo noticed that it hadn’t been easy for him to become a writer – it was sad that his first book nearly got made into a film in Hollywood but then they decided not in the end. Roald must have been disappointed – but then we realized how many of his books had been made into excellent films, and that must have cheered him up!

We could understand how you might change your mind about what you want to be, though: Maya used to want to be a horserider, or a singer, but now she wants to be an actress. Rafferty liked learning that if Roald Dahl hadn’t been a writer, he wanted to be a doctor: Raf’s going to run a zoo with his friends when he grows up, he’s going to be the zoo vet, which sounds a bit like the beginning of a Roald Dahl story …

We liked that Roald Dahl took any good opportunities to try different things and see the world.

But really we discovered that most of his inspiration came from his horrible school days. Being a toilet seat warmer! Really horrible … Although we suspect he might have made it sound worse than it really was, for dramatic effect. Scarlett pointed out that although he said he hated his matron, there was the story of all the boys giving her a present: and you don’t really give presents to people you don’t like, do you?

We thought what it would be like to go away to boarding school aged seven. Some of us have been away on school trips to Rooters holiday camp, and we thought it might be a bit like that. It’s okay if you like the teachers, but horrible if they’re not.

We imagined boarding school how it would be if we ran it: Grace thought it would be good to have pet rabbits, and jelly beans for breakfast lunch and tea (we weren’t all so sure about the jelly beans – Rafferty would rather have Turkish Delight for pudding, and a balanced diet of bagel with pesto and a poached egg, and carrot and coriander soup). Maya added four poster beds, horses, and indoor swimming pool, a dance studio, a theatre - and a dressing up closet the size of a ballroom. Giacomo thought there would fencing, and prizes; and Scarlett wanted to go swimming in jelly beans. All of which sounds a lot more fun than Roald Dahl’s school!

So, you see, we learned a lot that we didn’t know - and had a lot of fun imagining the rest ...




See you all next month, when we’ll be talking about FIVE CHILDREN AND IT, which was written more than a hundred years ago by a lady who lived very near here, called E.Nesbit. Jacqueline Wilson has written a book inspired by her original story, called FOUR CHILDREN AND IT: I wonder how different they are?

Friday, 25 January 2013

OTTIE AND THE BEA BOOK CLUB Meet to talk about VIKING BOY 23 January 2013

-->
We were very honoured to be joined this month by Tony Bradman, who came to talk to us about his thrilling novel VIKING BOY.

Rafferty got us off to a great start by declaring it was one of the best books he’s ever read, and then Mr Bradman gave us some great insights into how he came to write VIKING BOY.

He always writes with the same kind of pen (the one he has now was new this Christmas), and like us he did a lot of reading when he was at school. Also like many of us, he absolutely loved THE HOBBIT – the dragon Smaug, the dwarves, the fighting and the chainmail. It was only later on that he found out Tolkien had specialized in ancient languages while he was at university, and particularly in the Vikings: and that so many of those elements he loved in THE HOBBIT were inspired by the old Norse legends of trolls and warriors and flying beasts.

There’s a great list on his website of his favourite Viking tales, and top of the list is Henry Treece, who was quite a famous author when Mr Bradman was our age, with dark moody pictures by Charles Keeping (who lived near to here).

Tony had always loved these stories, and the old Norse legends and sagas, so he knew he wanted to write one of his own. It took a long time – more than a year – and a lot of research.

First, though, he needed a really good notebook. He keeps the notebooks for all his books in a big cupboard in his office, and he’d brought along the one for VIKING BOY to show us. It was big, and square, with an amazing picture of a metal minotaur head on the front. Tony bought it when he was on holiday in Greece, at a place called Mycenae (we enjoyed the local connection!).

Once he had the notebook, then he could start writing. It all begins with an outline of the story: who’s doing what, chapter by chapter (which makes it sound easier than it is – sometimes, something won’t work out and he’ll have to go back and change all the plans again).

And all the time, he was researching: he had a big long list of Viking names, and for about half of the book Gunnar was called Olaf – until it turned out there was already a book called Olaf the Viking …

Some of the research sounded really fun: Tony travelled to Norway and Denmark, and visited museums. There, he could see three old Viking ships that have been dug out of the ground and restored. He even rowed a replica ship himself, with a captain who looked just like a Viking; and dressed up in Viking cloaks and helmets.

We loved hearing about how to use a battleaxe (in a figure of eight, apparently) and how heavy a shield and armour would be: to hold them and fight, you would be exhausted after about ten minutes, which shows just how strong and fit the Vikings were.

Because of this detailed research, all the elements in VIKING BOY are based on the truth, even though the story itself is all from Tony Bradman’s imagination: the farm burning was inspired by NJAL’S SAGA, his all-time favourite Norse tale, and the Vikings really did carry their wealth as silver or gold rings around their arms. Tony told us they would loot and plunder, and when they did pay for things they’d hack bits of silver off the arm rings, instead of money.

After he had told us about writing the book, Tony asked if we had any questions: we had lots!

Maia:   It was really, really gory but I really liked it. Gauk was really mean. He reminded me of someone, but I can’t remember who.

TB:      Yes, my editor was worried about the violence in the book, but if you’re going to tell a story about the Viking age, you have to have it because they were violent.
            The important thing is that you see just how awful it is: people are really upset and frightened.
            And I liked Gauk, too. When I write a story, it’s important to have characters who are mysterious I think. And a surprise which keeps you interested!

Scarlett:           The really liked the bit about Valhalla. I wondered – is that what they believed?

TB:      Yes, they believed when warriors died in battle, Odin sent the Valkyries, all in black, riding winged wolves.
            And I thought: how cool is that?
            The reason Odin collected the warriors was because at the end of time (which they called Ragnorak), they thought there would be a big battle, and Odin would be attacked by the forces of evil, so he wanted all the best warriors on his side.
            Valhalla means Hall of the Fallen
            And Valkyrie means Collectors of the Fallen.

Who is your favourite character?

TB:      Gunnar. I put a lot of myself in him. I have a soft spot for Rurik as well: the funny thing about him is he just appeared. I was writing the scene where Gunnar is brought in front of Orm, and suddenly Rurik appeared as a character. I had to stop and rethink the story up to then, to fit him in, because he was such a good character: a sort of father figure for Gunnar.
            And I really enjoyed writing Thorkel and Viglaf, and their banter.

Grace:  Will you write another book? Will it be a series?

TB:      Well I’ve written lots of other books. I wanted to do another Viking one, but I have to convince my publishers: what do you all think?

We all agreed we’d like there to be a series!

Maia:   Where do you go if you don’t die with a sword in your hand?

TB:      I’d like to know! The Vikings did believe in an underworld run by a woman called Hel (which is where our word for hell comes from). And of course there are the Nornes, who are very similar to the three fates in Greek myths.

Mercedes:        I liked the story but there were some details that were a bit too gory.

TB:      My son likes real horror stories and movies, especially with zombies. I can’t watch them, because I get really scared and they stick in my mind. Some of those passages you didn’t like, I found quite difficult as well. I didn’t want to dwell on the violence.

Victor: I didn’t picture Rurik how he was in the pictures.

TB:      The illustrator is French, and draws graphic novels for a living. He was chosen by the publisher. I know what you mean though, sometimes the picture in your head is different. I think it’s a really striking image on the cover, but in my mind Gunnar has a lot more character than that.

Alice:   I think it should be a series. The shoutline made me think it actually was a series.

Rafferty:          We’re studying the Vikings at school, and my teacher is going to read the book to the class.

TB:      That’s brilliant. I’d be happy to come in and talk to your class, too.

Rafferty:          My friend thought it was too gruesome. But I thought it was epic!

Dylan: I liked the drowning scene.

Scarlett:           I thought the Valkyrie picture was really good. The way they draw the wolves is really detailed.

TB:      Yes, actually Brunhild is another favourite character. There’s a famous German composer called Wagner who wrote operas based on the Norse myths. And Brunhilde appears in those, usually as a large lady opera singer in a horned helmet with long blonde hair in plaits. And when I first started writing the Valkyrie scenes, that was what was in my mind – but it just wasn’t working. So I went back to the original myths and found the descriptions of the giant winged wolves and then it worked much better.

Scarlett:           Vikings didn’t have horned helmets.

TB:      No, that’s right – most were circular, more like a mask or a space helmet, smooth metal with eye holes. And they wore chainmail shirts, called Burnies, which were really heavy. They were tough people.

Maia:   In HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON, all the Vikings are big lumps of muscle – are they really like that?

TB:      Well no I think they were just normal people really, although evidence shows that they were bigger and taller than other people in Europe at the time so they did look quite imposing. They were outdoors a lot and trained hard. I tend to think of them as being like a rugby team: big, muscular, and thinking they’re immortal.

Maia:   I thought Skuli was handsome, but in this picture he’s not. I liked him as a character.

Giacomo:         Can names get really long?

TB:      yes. The Vikings used to do what they still do in Iceland today: your surname is the name of your father, with ‘sson’ or ‘dottir’ on the end, so in Iceland they can trace their ancestors back really far, almost all the way back to Viking times.

Maia:   Viking girls are never mentioned, I think you could do a story with Gunnar’s daughter …

TB:      you’re right, they aren’t mentioned so much. But you should read Kevin Crosley-Holland’s BRACELET OF BONES, that’s got a Viking girl as the main character. And Marie-Louise Jensen writes about Viking girls.

Isaac:   Would they have knives, or a sword?

TB:      A lot used spears or battleaxes. Ordinary people would be more likely to have just a rusty axe, like Hogni. Only the richer people had swords.

Then, sadly, the cow in Ottie and The Bea’s cuckoo clock mooed to let us know our time with Tony Bradman had come to an end. There was just time to go round the circle and tell our favourite bits from the book:



Grace:  The Valkyries

Maia:   When Gunnar was given his father’s sword

Alice:   The Valkyries

Jake:    The fight scene

Rafferty:          The eagle feather, and when Skuli gets killed

Giacomo:         When they’re tied to the posts and have to escape

Gareth:            When the wolf men burned the long house

Dylan: When Rurik kills Starkad

Isaac: The same as Gareth

Scarlett:           Gunnar’s time as a slave, and in Valhalla

Mercedes:        When he had to cross the rainbow

Victor: When Gunnar set fire to Orm’s hall

Thank you so much to Tony Bradman for coming to talk to us about VIKING BOY. We hope you do decide to write what happens next for Gunnar and his friends!

See you all next month, when we’ll be talking about FANTASTIC MR DAHL, Michael Rosen’s biography of Roald Dahl. It will be a good chance to discuss our favourite Roald Dahl stories too.